Part One – The basic definition
by John M. Joyce
It is often said today that democracy, specifically western liberal democracy, is under threat. Many people maintain that democracy cannot defend itself against those who revile it, and those who also want to get rid of it and put in its place some other system of determining leadership and government which would be more to their liking, because democracy itself is inherently flawed. Of course, this is said without anyone actually defining or stating what the flaws actually are or defining what is meant by democracy! Some maintain that democracy produces weak and ineffectual government which must always, by its nature, pander to the passing whims and fancies of the electorate. Others maintain that democracy will always lead to its own collapse as the people seek to extend democracy, over time, into every aspect of their civil lives. Neither of these statements is necessarily a condemnation of democracy – rather, each one is an indication of democracy’s strengths. more...
Any article which starts out by asserting that all the arguments against their own preferred argument are wrong is not very thoughtful (and hardly coheres with democratic principles). There have been strong arguments against democracy from the beginning of philosophy (notably Plato and Aristotle). Actually we don't really live in a democracy anyway. But to the extent that it is, our society has become a free-for-all orgy of idiocy to which this author has thrown in his two cents.