clear

Subscribe

Recent Posts

clear

Categories

clear
Friday, 4 December 2009
Security Incident Aboard AirTran Flight 297 Suggests Terror ?Dry Run?
Share
clear

Here is further confirmation of what we reported here and here. Doug Hagmann reports in the Canada Free Press:

On November 17, an incident took place aboard AirTran Flight 297 scheduled to fly from Atlanta Hartsfield Airport to Houston that the media does not want to cover and everyone from the airline to the TSA and other government agencies want to keep very quiet.  The reasons, I have been told, is fear of predatory lawsuits, negative publicity from accusations of religious profiling, and the obligatory subjugation to mindless mandatory Muslim sensitivity training that make a mockery of our American system of values. Interestingly, one airline official told me “we don’t want to become another flight 300,” which is a reference to a very similar scenario that took place aboard US Airways Flight 300 exactly three years ago.

I was first contacted about this incident two days after it happened by a passenger who was aboard AirTran Flight 297. Based on the allegations made by this passenger, we conducted additional research, interviews and investigation, all of which takes time to insure accuracy, and are now able to release our report of the incident that took place aboard that aircraft. Be prepared to be shocked, angered, and perhaps saddened by our national and corporate acquiescence to mafia-type tactics by Islamists who are engaged in a full frontal assault, and laughing about it.

Unsurprisingly, the facts we developed during the course of our investigation are inconsistent with those being reported in the media, despite the media having the responsibility to report the truth.
 

The incident

A group of thirteen men dressed in traditional Muslim attire were among 73 passengers who boarded AirTran Flight 297 on Tuesday, 17 November 2009, a routine flight scheduled to depart Atlanta Hartsfield Airport, gate C-16 at 4:43 PM ET to Houston Hobby Airport. Reports developed by this investigator found two witnesses who observed direct interaction among all of these Muslim men at the terminal.

As the passengers boarded the aircraft, two of the Muslim men took seats in first class, while the remaining eleven were seated throughout the remaining rows of the aircraft. Most had carrying-on bags that they stowed in the overhead compartments above their seats.

As the aircraft began to taxi to the runway, a female flight attendant was beginning to issue the normal passenger advisories over the PA system. Almost on cue at the time passengers were told to turn off all electronic devices, one of the Muslim men seated in the front of the plane began to use his cell phone in a manner that was described by a flight attendant and passenger “as deliberate and obvious.”  He was talking loudly in Arabic, nearly at the level of the flight attendant. Some reports suggest that this man actually called another Muslim passenger, although this has not been immediately confirmed. It is possible, however, as another passenger reported that a Muslim man seated toward the rear of the plane answered his cellular phone at the same time the man in the front began using his.

At this point, the flight attendant in the front of the plane approached the Muslim man using his telephone and instructed him to immediately turn it off. A second female flight attendant did the same at the rear of the aircraft. Concurrent with this cellular activity, two other Muslim men seated adjacent near the middle of the aircraft began operating what one passenger described as a palm type camcorder, ostensibly to view previously taken footage. It is possible, according to one flight attendant interviewed by this investigator, however, that the camcorder was being used for recording purposes. Whatever its use, a third flight attendant, aware of the incidents taking place in the front and rear of the aircraft, approached the two men for the purpose of securing the camcorder.  At least two passengers reported that the men became abusive to the flight attendant and initially refused to comply with her request.

It was at this time that most of the passengers began to notice the multiple incidents involving over a dozen men dressed in Islamic attire. Next, as if previously rehearsed, at least ten of the 13 Muslim men aboard the aircraft began to leave their seats at the same time. At least one passenger stated she observed one of the Muslim passengers using his cell phone to take photos of other passengers on the aircraft, while one other Muslim passenger sang loudly in Arabic. According to information provided to this investigator from one of the flight crew who was alerted to an onboard emergency, the aircraft was now being taxied back to the terminal. The TSA, FAA and FBI were notified.

At the terminal

Once back at the terminal, the thirteen men were escorted from the aircraft by TSA and security officials. According to a report from an airline security official, their baggage was also removed and searched, the search finding nothing of apparent danger. According to a law enforcement official interviewed by telephone by this investigator on Monday, investigation revealed that all of the Muslim passengers are acquainted with each other and are associated with (or have ties to) a large Islamic center that has been the subject of investigative interest.

According to one aircraft passenger I interviewed, what happened next was “unbelievable” and caused a great deal of upset among the aircraft passengers and flight crew (some who opted off the flight in anger, fear, or admittedly, a mixture of both emotions).

After a lengthy delay while officials dealt with these Muslim passengers, ten (one uncorroborated report suggests 11) of the Muslim passengers were permitted to re-board the same aircraft to complete their flight. Some passengers and flight crew, traumatized by the blatant actions of the Muslim passengers, refused to travel with the Muslims who caused this orchestrated disturbance.

The flight continues

According to flight logs and information from one of the flight crew who continued with the flight, AirTran 297 ultimately departed Atlanta and arrived in Houston later that evening. The flight, however, was not without its curious incidents by the very same Muslim men who caused the initial delay and disturbance.

During the flight, one passenger interviewed by this investigator described the behavior of two of the Muslim passengers as less overt but still suspicious in nature. Without apparent legitimate purpose, one Muslim passenger moved a stowed bag from one part of the aircraft to another, well away from his seated position. Another spoke loudly in Arabic, with all appearing to interact in one form or another.

Ultimately, the flight landed safely and despite the early incidents in Atlanta, the Muslim passengers appeared able to leave freely from the terminal.

Comments from flight crew and airline personnel

As initially stated, proper and accurate investigation takes time to corroborate eyewitness accounts, which are often unreliable, contradictive and in cases like this, colored by emotion.  Having interviewed a total of seven-(7) individuals directly involved in this incident over the last several days, including two law enforcement officers who handled the after action reports, the situation pertaining to the initial 13 and remaining 10 or 11 Muslim men allowed to continue their travels was far greater than an incident involving the unauthorized use of a cell phone that resulted in a minor flight delay, as reported by the mainstream media.

According to one airline security official, “This was a deliberate, well planned attempt to disrupt a domestic flight that was organized in advance of the boarding of these [Muslim] passengers. The purpose of their actions appeared to be multi-faceted, not the least of which was an attempt to change their status from passengers to victims of religious profiling. The situation was handled in a manner that we believe might have avoided an incident like USAir had in 2006, where everyone from the passengers who reported suspicious behavior to the airline was subjected to legal action by the Muslim passengers.”

While litigation might have been avoided, passengers and flight crew remain traumatized, and our air travel system was unnecessarily disrupted during one of the busiest air travel weeks in the U.S. The agenda of the Islamists behind this incident is clear, yet no one in the media seems to have the desire to expose these ideological cretins for what they are.

clear
Posted on 12/04/2009 6:15 AM by Rebecca Bynum
Comments
5 Dec 2009
dumbledoresarmy

 If this story is an Urban Myth / Urban Legend in the making - which it may be - then as far as I am concerned, the simple fact that it exists, and that it is the kind of story it is, tells us something very very interesting.

Brunvand (author of a book about Urban Legends, 'The Choking Doberman') interprets Urban Myths (which in their most modern form circulate as forwarded emails) as classic folktales and indeed, in many cases, as Cautionary Tales, fables with a point.

Whatever *this* story is teaching, it is NOT that 'Islam is peace', or that we should roll over and submit to Muslim bullying!

As regards this unnamed war we are all in, today, the war that might be called the Third Jihad, Islam's third major attempt to conquer and dominate the entire world, it seems to me that, although Hollywood has failed as yet to identify the threat and produce the needful, deep in the collective subconscious of the Western public that ancient and excellent storyteller, 'Anonymous' is getting to work.

Let's watch and wait, and see how many more such tales begin to swim up out of the depths of McElligott's Pool.

 



4 Dec 2009
James

 The Air Line now claims the so-called eye witness was never on the plane.

 

http://www.ajc.com/business/airtran-flight-297airtran-flight-297-man-226517.html

 

hfufpe

 



4 Dec 2009
yona saul

 After learning that these men were permitted to go on their way, unimpeded, I mentioned to my husband that if these were unruly young people (long haired, tattooed, guitars, and looking like "hippies"), they'd also be asked to stop or leave the plane.  The plane must both feel and be safe.  This kind of political correctness led to the Ft. Hood incident..  Need I say more?  



4 Dec 2009
Artemis

If my 5-year old child makes a joke or asks a question about a bomb while we're waiting in the security line or sitting on the airplane, our family would not be allowed on the flight.  These rules are in place because of a long history of hijackings and bombings of airliners, almost exclusively by Muslim men.

These Muslim men can act as they did, and are allowed to continue on the flight after terrorizing the passengers and crew.

I merely point out the obvious imbalance in limitations placed on the behavior of, on the one hand, Muslim males, and on the other, everyone else in the world.



4 Dec 2009
kendra

Steve Gill also had Keith Robinson on his show yesterday. It can be listened to here: http://www.gillreport.com/.  Scroll to the middle and go to HOUR 3 of December 3's show.  Keith is the second witness and is very credible.  Steve Gill also has said he's spoken with the first witness who isn't featured on the air, but said he found him to be credible, too.



4 Dec 2009
mark

If they were trolling for a lawsuit as it appears, they should get two, as defendants, for the emotional distress caused to the other passengers and crew and a separate cause of action related to the disruption of the flight.