Recent Posts



Monday, 21 December 2009
Somalia is becoming a haven for international terrorists

From The Times
Pass beyond what is described as government territory in the Somali capital — a few blocks between the airport, the harbour and the presidential palace — and you are at the mercy of al-Shabaab, the extremist Islamic group that holds sway across southern and central Somalia. Where it rules, it has implemented laws and punishments reminiscent of Afghanistan under Taleban rule.
It has banned bras, football, dancing and musical ringtones. This weekend al-Shabaab decreed that men must grow beards and shave their moustaches. Its fighters have destroyed Sufi tombs and disinterred colonial-era Italian corpses. Its Sharia courts have ordered public floggings, the chopping off of hands and feet of thieves, the stoning to death of adulterers and beheadings of apostates and spies.
Suicide attacks and roadside bombs have grown in number, leading Western intelligence agencies to conclude that there are growing links between al-Shabaab and al-Qaeda. The agencies warn that the country is becoming a haven for international terrorists.
Today the Transitional Federal Government cowers behind 5,000 AU protectors in the piece of Mogadishu that it controls — although recently a suicide bomber struck within the supposed safe zone. In other attacks this month dozens of medical students were killed with three government ministers in a suicide attack. At the weekend 14 people died as Government and insurgent forces traded mortar fire. Every week fresh reports of death and horror cement Mogadishu’s reputation as the worst place on earth.
Harakat al-Shabaab — meaning “Youth Movement” — emerged in 2005 as a cross-clan Islamist militia designed to support the Islamic Courts Union, which aimed to defeat the clan warlords that had devastated the country since the collapse of the last functioning administration in 1991.
Many of al-Shabaab’s leaders are radical Somali veterans of the Afghanistan wars. Last year Ahmed Abdi Godane, known as Abu Zubeyr, became its top commander. He is believed to have fought in Afghanistan in the 1980s and is described by one observer as “a hardcore jihadi”. . . Other senior commanders, all of whom enjoy a large degree of autonomy, include Mukhtar Ali Robow, also known as Abu Mansoor, an experienced fighter who ran the training camp from which al-Shabaab emerged, and Ibrahim Haji Jaama who won his nom de guerre “al-Afghani” thanks to years of fighting in Afghanistan and Kashmir.
Because of the growing military pressure in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iraq, hundreds of foreign fighters have flocked to Somalia to fight Sheikh Ahmed’s UN and US-backed administration. They have brought with them a radical ideology of global jihad and some — including a white US citizen known as “al-Amriki” — have taken leading field commander roles.
Their influence is changing al-Shabaab from a local insurgent group into a player in the wider battle between Islamic extremism and the West. “There is increasing control exercised by the foreign leadership of al-Shabaab,” said Peter Pham, associate professor at James Madison University. “It is not just control of resources, foreign fighters and trainers, but of the actual decision-making.”
At the same time, al-Shabaab has fallen out with its former ally, Hizb ul-Islam, with whom it launched a joint offensive to oust Sheikh Ahmed in May. This staunchly nationalist group of Islamists is led by Sheikh Hassan Dahir Aweys, who helped to train the first al-Shabaab fighters and is wanted as a terrorist by the US.
This year fighting erupted between al-Shabaab and Hizb ul-Islam over control of revenues from the southern port of Kismayo. This has since turned into a deeper split. “Hizb ul-Islam’s orientation is domestic but al-Shabaab’s focus is on a broader ideological Islam,” said Dr Pham.
I don't understand why we have so many Somalis in London - there are no Commonwealth connections to attempt to justify their presence - they have no skills to make them desirable as immigrants - only the Christians subject to persecution command public sympathy.

Posted on 12/21/2009 2:11 AM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
21 Dec 2009
Alan R


And even 'The Times' (May 2009) pointed to the connection between Islamic jihad activity in Somalia and Britain:

"Somali Britons with jihad training pose terrorist risk" --

"For Britain, the evidence of spreading AQ [Al Qaeda]training camps in Somalia is particularly alarming because of the large Somali community in the UK. About 70,000 live in London, 10,000 in the borough of Tower Hamlets. "




21 Dec 2009
Hugh Fitzgerald

A question is asked by Esmeralda at the end of her posting: why are there so many Somalis in London? Why are there any Somalis in Lewiston, Maine or Minneapolis, Minnesota or Nashville, Tennessee? A few years ago the then-Mayor of Lewishton, spoke out about the Somali presence using up city funds meant for all of the city's  poor, and he was predictably condemned as a "racist" -- though  in the city's poor who were being shortchanged were non-white Americans -- and forced to recant. It is now known, from DNA testing, that most of those Somalis who were allowed in as part of "family reunification" joined people who were not their relatives at all, but in the business of claiming such relationships for money. And finally, along with the great expense of supporting immigrants who have no experience of a  modern economy and many of whom seem impervious to suitable training,  with a great many here, under false claims of family reunification, often practicing polygamy and fiddling the system to extract as much support as they can possibly get (and sometimes boasting of it, as has happened with Somali taxidrivers, of their plural wives and the support they manage to obtain).

Finally, why are any Muslims, from Muslim countries, allowed in as "refugees"? They are not fleeing Islam. Are they fleeing "violence"? But Muslim countries are inherently full of violence and aggression, and if we in the advanced Western world admit all those as refugees who are "fleeing violence" then we would be taking in hundreds of millions of the world's Muslims and, indeed, actually favoring them over the world's non-Muslims, who tend to live in less violent places.

And these "refugees" are not like refugees from the Nazis and the Communists, who hated Nazism and Communism. No, these "refugees" from the Misrule and Economic Paralysis of Islam bring Islam with them, in their mental baggage, and proudly unpack  it and then try to live according to Islam and to fight any attempts to restrict them, and what's more, they attempt not to warn against the menace of Islam but tro spread it. 

Do the immigration policies of the Western world make any sense?